Tag Archives: Labor Department

Trump’s Assault on Workers

As a workers’ compensation attorney, I tend to view current events through the prism of their effect on workers and more specifically injured workers.  The Trump Administration has rolled back his predecessor’s strides in environment, labor and finance, civil rights, health care, government reform, immigration, and education.  I would like to specifically address reverses in worker and consumer safety.  The Washington Post updated how Trump is rolling back Obama’s legacy through 16 executive actions, 74 cabinet level agency decisions, 14 congressional review acts, and a piece of new legislation. 

  • Specifically, in terms of worker and consumer safety, the Mine Safety and Health Administration is revising a mining inspection rule published three days after Obama left office by allowing examiners to do their reviews while miners are working letting companies not record hazardous conditions if they are immediately corrected.
  • The Trump Administration Interior Department ordered the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine to stop a study of health risks for residents near surface mining operations in the Appalachians.
  • The EPA delayed implementing a rule that would have changed how agricultural workers are protected from pesticides.
  • The EPA is delaying implementation of rule to require manufacturers to label formaldehyde and composite wood products.
  • A Coast Guard plan to regulate firefighting systems on tanker ships and helipads on offshore platforms was withdrawn.
  • Additionally, a Coast Guard rule that would have required all ships and berths to maintain equipment and technical systems for safety was withdrawn.
  • OSHA delayed implementing a rule regulating construction worker exposure to silica (linked to lung disease and cancer).
  • The House and Senate passed a bill signed by President Trump eliminating worker safety regulations aiming to track and reduce workplace injuries and death.
  • The Labor Department removed from its agenda a proposal to stiffen exposure standards for chemical solvents.
  • The Labor Department cancelled plans to lower permissible exposure limits for some substances that had been set in 1971 and cancelled plans to revoke obsolete permissible exposure limits for other substances.
  • The Labor Department removed from its agenda a proposal to tighten exposure standards for styrene, a chemical used in plastics identified as a carcinogen.

This laundry list of anti-worker executive actions, Cabinet-level agency decisions and Congressional review acts reveals the hypocrisy of Trump’s campaign promises to help working families.  Rather, it reveals his completely anti-worker policy.

“Per Diem” Payments Latest Employer Fraud Issue in Workers’ Compensation

I have written often about the public’s perception that workers file fraudulent claims in workers’ compensation. The public perception (which ranges from one in ten to approximately one in three) is completely erroneous. The actual statistics indicate the incidence of employee fraud is as little as one-sixth of one percent, or two workers in ten thousand claims (based on the latest statistics available from the Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Division).

Employer fraud, on the other hand, is rampant and grows daily into the billions of dollars. A recent report by the U.S. Department of Wage and Hour Division out of New Orleans indicated six Gulf Coast staffing agencies agreed to pay thousands of workers nearly $3.5 million in back wages after investigators found part of the workers’ wages were mislabeled as “per diem” payments as reimbursement for expenses they never incurred. The Labor Department indicated the recent investigations were part of an ongoing initiative aimed at ending an illegal and alarming trend of employers labeling part of employee wages as Per Diem payments, often to avoid overtime, payroll taxes, and other costs (such as workers’ compensation insurance premiums). The Department of Labor noted that companies break the law when they call part of a worker’s regular wages “per diem” expense reimbursement instead of wages. They do this in order to lower labor costs, avoid paying overtime, and avoid making payments toward federal and state taxes, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security payments. These kinds of employers gain an unfair advantage over their competitors, some of whom are paying these taxes appropriately.